If you have any questions, please call us on 01923 249 700

Feederism in popular tradition. Although hampered notably with a poor attitude against it,

Erotic weight gain sources and proponents have appeared in several types of news. Within the tv program Roseanne, Roseanne Barr portrays exactly just what consider that is many end up being the very first exemplory instance of a gainer appearing in a sitcom. Although never saying that the smoothness she portrayed regarding the show had been the main feederism sub-culture, Barr’s ex-husband Tom Arnold has made many mentions of their love of “feeding their spouse”. Tv character Rosie O’Donnell was championed by both the homosexual and feederist community on her part to advertise not merely homosexual affairs, but additionally increasing awareness and acceptance of erotic fat gain. Feederism had been additionally depicted into the horror film Feed (2005), which depicted with optimum grotesqueness a feeder-gainer relationship that has been pathological.

Variants of feederism

The feeder/gainer subculture is quite diverse and simply like in any subculture you can find various choices and various tastes.

For instance feeders that are many like fat gain which range from slim to chubby while other people prefer fat gain reaching up to obese and beyond. Various feeders are proven to favour various parts of the body in the same way in just about any other intimately oriented subculture. Some like big, fattened breasts although some choose hips and buttocks, bellies, etc. Many choose more youthful gainers these are generally an issue when compared to amount that is vast of gainers, which some favor.

Feederism shouldn’t be confused with filling even though feeder might sympathize along with its cause. Stuffing is merely feeding some body until the stomach is significantly swollen with food, hence reaching a result near to fattening. Feeders generally speaking choose the accumulation of fat within the physical human anatomy as opposed to the stuffing of meals to the stomach. Since stuffing has few long-lasting results as in opposition to gaining it is more widespread to actually practice filling.

Stuffing is just a sexual fetish this is certainly quite definitely associated with the feederism fetish.

The 2 can almost be thought to get in conjunction. Both fetishes include becoming intimately stimulated because of the use of large volumes of meals. Just What sets filling apart is the fact that its function is entirely to quickly attain an extreme state of fullness, unlike in feederism, when the express intention is of feeding a prepared (or often unwilling) topic during a period of time, and gaining fat from this.

Filling, in the other hand, is extremely short-term and involves filling the belly with just as much meals or beverage as you can, which makes it distend and bloat to huge proportions. This could be element of feederism in which the “feeder” would like to see some belly that is immediate results and maybe force feeds the topic. The real work of filling the stomach could be very intimately stimulating to your topic. As soon as the stomach swells in proportions it presses straight straight down in the intimate organs as well as in some individuals, this could easily create an arousing stimulus. Yourself as much as possible, filling and swelling your belly to get the required results since it can produce sexual gratification, this can be a solo act, thus feeding. Getting a belly that is full make an otherwise flat bellied person look pregnant. Therefore to males, seeing their gf, spouse, or other ready subject (or vice versa, some females want to do that with their guys) seeing an “illusion” of maternity could be very stimulating for them.

Numerous using this fetish also provide an admiration that is great of ladies’ bellies, and might have a maternity fetish, called maiesiophilia. This fetish is apparently fairly typical, as evidenced by the many web sites dedicated towards the topic.

Critique Fat fetishists are criticized to be interested in lovers who’re unhealthy.

Fat fetishists counter that such claims by medical professionals are biased for assorted reasons, like the impact associated with the diet industry, and further pointing to instances where in actuality the problems of being obese have actually been overstated. 1 Generally, the argument is situated when you look at the undeniable fact that obesity associated illness studies are correlational, in the place of showing an immediate causation between being obese and increased rates of infection. Facets such as for example inactivity, increased consumption that is trans-fat increased usage of preservatives, meals dyes, as well as other indigestible, inorganic substances are typical confounding aspects of current obesity/illness research. Due to culture’s willingness to link increased bodyweight and disease, numerous FAs feel societal stress to full cover up their choice, and fat admiration communities have actually applied to them an adoption associated with the “cabinet” metaphor. 2



  • Gainer – a person who gains fat, generally speaking from the homosexual male community
  • Encourager -One who encourages another (generally speaking a gainer) to get weight, additionally generally speaking from the male community that is gay
  • BBW – Big Striking Woman
  • SSBBW – Super-Sized Big gorgeous girl, typically bigger when compared to a BBW and sometimes restricted in mobility
  • BHM – Big male that is handsome
  • SSBHM – Super-Sized Big Handsome Male, typically much bigger than the usual BHM and frequently restricted in flexibility
  • FA – Fat Admirer, utilized both in a gender-neutral feeling and to male fat admirers
  • FFA – Female Fat Admirer


  1. ^ Gibbs, W. Scientific United States. (2005-06). “Obesity: An Overblown Epidemic? “. Retrieved 2006-04-08. Always always Check date values in: |date= (assistance)
  2. ^ NAAFA Policy. “Fat Admirers”. Retrieved 2007-04-08.

3. Giovanelli, Dina and Natalie Peluso. 2006. “Feederism: a brand new sexual satisfaction and subculture”. Pp 309-314 when you look at the Handbook of New Sexuality Studies. Edited by Steven Seidman. Oxford, UK: Routledge.


By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website.

I would like to receive promotional emails and offers