Amelia E. Talley
Texas Tech University
Mackenzie A. Cook
Catherine A. Schroy
Texas Ladies’ University
Utilizing ladies’ self-identified identity that is sexual the present research compares motivations for very very very first same-sex intimate encounters also connected experiential results. We additionally examine whether relations between intimate motivations and outcomes that are experiential as being a function of females’s intimate identification status. Individuals had been ladies (N=123), many years 18-to-29 (M=21.59, SD=3.33), who self-reported a brief history of same-sex intimate contact. Roughly 27% of females recognized as solely heterosexual (in other words., EH), 35% as mainly heterosexual (for example., ‘mostly heterosexual’ MH), and 38% as solely or primarily lesbian/ gay, or bisexual (i.e., LGB). Individuals finished a paid survey. MH and LGB females reported very very first same-sex intimate encounters which were more inspired by closeness and research motives, in accordance with EH womenpared to MH and LGB females, EH also involved in less intimate tasks along with their very first partner that is same-sex. Intimacy and exploration motives had been associated with good experiential results during very very very first contact that is same-sex. Associations between motivations and experiential results had been maybe maybe not moderated by intimate identification. Findings subscribe to understanding motivations and experiences linked to ladies’ very first same-sex intimate encounters and show that not totally all females with a brief history of same-sex intimate contact afterwards recognize by having a minority intimate identification label.
Humans participate in sexual intercourse for a number of reasons and, very important to the motivational way of understanding intimate behavior, these motivating factors are considered to contour subsequent experiences and expressions of sex (Cooper, Barber, Zhaoyang, & Talley, 2011). The particular reasons encouraging sexual intercourse, including same-sex task, can mirror ones own wider approach or avoidance orientations ( e.g., Birnbaum et al., 2014), that are theorized become connected to distinct neurological and behavioral systems (Birnbaum et al., 2014; Gray, 1970, 1987). For instance, present findings claim that underlying excitatory/inhibitory motivational systems affect the motivation value related to various behavior that is risk-takingBirnbaum et al., 2014; Nagoski et al., 2012) and intimate stimuli (Birnbaum et al. 2014; Ferrey et al., 2012) and might have broad effect on psychosocial and intimate functioning (Birnbaum et al. sexy hot babes 2014; Impett et al., 2008).
The significance of understanding motivational facets for starting same-sex intercourse is self-evident. This knowledge has got the possible to tell basic research examining facets that motivate adolescents’ and teenagers’ research of numerous intimate tourist attractions and impulses and fundamentally notify their self-identification with a specific intimate identification (in other words., intimate identification development; Rosario, Schrimshaw, & Hunter, 2006). The work that is current has relevance for used researchers who look for to produce interventions that restrict negative consequences ( e.g., intimately transmitted infections) for folks with distinct underlying motivations for sex that might potentiate risk-taking during initial and subsequent intimate encounters ( e.g., intercourse intoxicated by medications or liquor).
Although initial intimate encounters could have lasting effect on subsequent sexual activity and development ( ag e.g., Epstein, Bailey, Manhart, Hill, & Hawkins, 2014), a systematic comparison of teenagers’ subjective connection with and motivations for his or her initial intimate encounters according to their self-identified intimate identification, irrespective of their partner’s biological intercourse, has yet become carried out. Ones own intimate identification is informed by different facets of their sex, including their self-labeling ( e.g., heterosexual, bisexual) also their attraction toward and engagement in sex with partners of varying sex identities (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994; Morgan, 2013). Findings from qualitative interviews with “self-identified intimate minorities” (Galupo, Davis, Grynkiewiez, & Mitchell, 2014) claim that self-labeling of your respective intimate identification is of main value in considering and one that is defining intimate orientation. Individuals’ present, self-ascribed identity that is sexual regarded as “primary over present and previous experience that may otherwise be interpreted as ‘contradictory’” (p. 16).